Citing overreach and privacy concerns, three significant crypto advocacy organizations are suing the IRS to challenge the new regulations that classify DeFi platforms as brokers.
Three significant crypto advocacy organizations—the Blockchain Association, DeFi Education Fund, and Texas Blockchain Council—have initiated litigation against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regarding its recent regulations that pertain to decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. These organizations contend that the IRS has exceeded its legal authority by classifying DeFi platforms as brokers, which has sparked a backlash within the crypto sector.
The IRS has recently broadened the definition of “broker” to encompass decentralized exchanges and front-end platforms, necessitating that they disclose all user details and crypto transactions. The objective of these regulations, which are forthcoming in 2027, is to enhance the transparency of digital asset trading. Nevertheless, detractors contend that the agency’s interpretation exceeds the extent of its statutory powers and contravenes the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
The advocacy groups contend that these regulations impose an inordinate amount of compliance burdens, particularly on software developers who are developing DeFi trading interfaces. They caution that this could impede innovation and shift emerging technologies offshore.
The crypto community as a whole has also expressed its vehement opposition. Bill Hughes, a litigator at Consensys, critiqued the timing of the rule’s publication during the holiday season, implying that it was a strategy to reduce public opposition. The regulation, according to Miles Jennings, General Counsel at a16z Crypto, is a heavy-handed approach that is intended to limit the development of DeFi.
Furthermore, Alexander Grieve, the Vice President of Government Affairs at Paradigm, encouraged Congress to reevaluate and potentially obstruct the regulation. French Hill and Patrick McHenry, among other lawmakers, have expressed their disapproval of the rule, describing it as an overreach by the Treasury. Hill characterized it as a policy that was inadequately crafted and finalized in the final days of the current administration.
The lawsuit emphasizes the increasing tension between regulators and the crypto industry, emphasizing apprehensions regarding the future of decentralized finance in the United States, as well as privacy and innovation.
Also Read: $10 million is raised by iDEGEN as the pre-market auction concludes in three days
